House of 'Demo', Dance, Drama
Parliament of Ghana
Kofi Yeboah Writes,
Deputy Attorney-General and Minister of Justice nominee Dr Justice Srem-Sai and Minority Leader Alexander Afenyo-Markin come face-to-face and suit-for-suit at the vetting of the former by the Appointments Committee, both poised to dive into the ‘Legalistic Ocean’.
But
strangely, the two lawyers strip themselves of the dress code that marks their legal
identity for unaccustomed cloak that flags their cultural naivety.
Instantly,
the vetting proceeding turns into a dance theatre for Agbadza and Akpi
amid choruses whose lyrics – ‘withdraw’ and ‘I won’t withdraw’ – are as
rhythmic as the two dances invoked and in vogue.
First,
Afenyo-Markin shoots at the nominee: “How have you gotten yourself immersed into
the culture of your people?”
And
I’m thinking: Why must the Minority Leader immerse himself into the culture of a
community instead of the legal issues of the country?
But Srem-Sai
is the one facing the music (not me), and he responds: “I have lived among my people
for a greater part of my life. I visit my people. And as you can see from
behind, my chiefs are here with me….”
Just
then, and before the nominee completes his submission, Afenyo-Markin slaps him
with an injunction, as he shreds Srem’s streaming.
With
hand gestures like a music conductor (which will be understood soon), the
Minorrity Leader stops Srem-Sai from immersing himself into the culture of his
people, as he (Afenyo-Markin) cuts sharply into the nominee’s reference and
reverence to his chiefs sitting behind him.
“Honourable
nominee, don’t go there; don’t go there. You deal with the issue. They [chiefs]
being here is neither here nor there. You deal with the culture”.
I’m thinking
the intervention by the Ranking Member is rude to the nominee, disrespectful to
the chiefs sitting behind the nominee and contemptuous to the audience
in-person and out-person.
Also,
I’m wondering: Is chieftaincy not part of our culture? Are chiefs not the
custodians of our culture?
I’m totally
confused at this instance.
The
nominee seems confused too, and he seeks guidance from the Minority Leader,
hoping Afenyo-Markin will mark him good this time round.
“I
want to know what exactly you mean by how I immerse myself in the culture?”
Dr Justice Srem-Sai, Deputy Attorney-General and Minister of Justice Nominee
Akpi ‘demo’
It is obvious Afenyo-Markin is looking for detail in his understanding of culture by banishing chiefs and chieftaincy from, and extolling dance in, the coronation of culture.
But
his search for detail will soon discover the devil immersed therein, after inviting
the nominee to demonstrate Akpi on
the floor of the House.
“So
Honourable Nominee, we are here to learn about our country. Errm, kindly
demonstrate the Akpi dance; a bit;
just for a second”.
Oops!
Did I hear the Minority Leader well?
My imagination
instantly flees with many questions tolling: Are drummers for Akpi in the House and ready for the
demonstration of the dance? Will the vetting room be rearranged to create space
for the demonstration of the dance? Will the nominee perform Akpi in his suit (comic) or change into
traditional cloth that suits the dance (realistic) for the demonstration?
Among
the audience, I hear some murmuring; they look troubled too by the invitation
to Akpi demonstration, and their
spontaneous uproar hits a note of discord and disapproval.
Indeed,
the message of disapproval from the audience is loud and clear, and I’m
expecting Afenyo-Markin to pick the signal, withdraw from his comical dance
mode and look sharp in his suit!
But
hey! The Effutu MP, like the late Vice President of Ghana Kow Nkensen Arkaah
who hailed from Winneba, is a ‘Stubborn Cat’!
What
he, perhaps, does not know is that no matter how stubborn a cat may be, there
are so many ways to kill it, and there are a group of people who have mastered
the craft of killing a cat and they will demonstrate their skill, whether the
cat is calm or stubborn.
Alexander Afenyo-Markin, Minority Leader
Withdrawal syndrome
With a natural deep voice and scarce smile on the face, the Chairman of the Appointments Committee, Bernard Ahiafor, who is also the MP for Akatsi South, in the Volta Region, is cast in an image that even the wildest cat may flee from for dear life.
“Honourable
nominee, the question is overruled; you are not going to demonstrate,” Ahiafor is
blunt in dismissing the question by the Minority Leader.
This
(over)ruling will mark the ‘26th February Cross-swords’ between the
Chairman and the Ranking Member at a venue about 500 metres away from the spot
of the ‘28th February Crossroad Shooting’ to be marked two days
later, except that the latter is historic and the former is pathetic.
Afenyo-Markin’s
demeanor clearly shows he is not happy about the overruling of his dance
demonstration agenda; his ego has been badly bruised, and with a stern look at
the Chairman, he pounces at him like a wild cat to get his pound of flesh.
“Chairman,
if you decide to be whimsical and capricious, it will not advance the work of
this Committee”.
At
this moment, smile is no longer scarce on the face of Chairman Ahiafor; it is
actually banished, as he promptly demands from the Minority Leader a withdrawal
of the words “whimsical” and “capricious” directed at him.
I’m
expecting Afenyo-Markin to withdraw those harsh words in the interest of
progress.
In
fact, I admire his character to render apology whenever he gets something
wrong, and he earns my respect after apologising to Srem-Sai in reference to
the nominee’s law firm as ‘Ghana Legal Practice’ instead of ‘General Legal
Practice’.
But
as I’m looking forward to him withdrawing the words “whimsical” and
“capricious”, he is also looking straight into the face of the Chairman and
swerves me.
“I
will not withdraw. You were whimsical and capricious in the way you overruled
my question. I will not withdraw,” he fiercely rebuts.
Bernard Ahiafor, Chairman of Appointments Committee
Ahiafor
trots back onto the floor and reiterates his ruling, leaving no doubt in word
and deed (notably facial expression) about his frown on the invitation to dance:
“You
will not demonstrate any dance,” he tells the nominee, adding, “This is not a
demonstration forum. This is Appointments Committee. So I insist that you
withdraw the word that I’m being whimsical and capricious”.
This
must be vehement attack on the ego of Afenyo-Markin and he does not look
enthused about the attendant hilarious atmosphere, parrying the Chairman’s withdrawal
order and launching another punch of his own, heavy and straight in the face.
“Chairman,
I will not withdraw. I’m sorry. I will not withdraw; you rudely overruled me. I
will not withdraw”.
Now,
egos have bolted; tolerance and magnanimity have fallen apart, and the centre
of the House cannot hold.
Chairman
Ahiafor has more rag tags to contend with than just “whimsical” and
“capricious,” as he pushes the Minority Leader to withdraw the new tag: “I will
again ask that you withdraw the word ‘rudely’”.
But
the Minority Leader is unfazed by the stern face of Ahiafor: “Chairman, one
more time, I will not withdraw. I’m sorry”.
Then,
in a rather commanding tone, Chairman Ahiafor descends on Afenyo-Markin: “Will
you withdraw?”
“Chairman,
I’m sorry, I will not withdraw,” the Minority Leader stands his grounds.
I’m
thinking the Chairman must be more tactful and diplomatic in his (over)ruling.
In
fact, the Chairman has failed to tactfully address two previous complaints made
by the Ranking Member – one against the Attorney-General and Minister of
Justice and the other against the Majority Chief Whip.
“The
learned Attorney-General knows he is somebody I respect. And I don’t want him
to be on this table, when I’m asking questions, he says what is the relevance….
And Chairman, these things must stop. Let’s stop all these side comments and
let’s focus. Yoo!”
With
such concerns and warning early on, it appears Afenyo-Markin is already
pumped-up for sword-crossing.
Now
that the Ranking Member, who hails from Winneba, has proven to be a ‘Stubborn
Cat’ and will not beat a retreat, I’m wondering what the Chairman, who hails
from the Volta Region, will do to this ‘Stubborn Cat’.
Chairman
Ahiafor decides to end it all but not without gathering his ruffled authority.
“Well,
to demonstrate to you that I am the Chairman of this particular vetting
committee that may be your last question”.
He then
proceeds to acknowledge the guests who accompanied the nominee to conclude the
vetting.
And I
also proceed to conclude that the ‘demo’, dance and drama exhibited at the
vetting on this fateful day is a big disgrace to Parliament.
Shame!
END
Kindly share your thoughts on this article and also read other articles on this blog
Writer's Email: kofiyebo@yahoo.com
Good Read 👌
ReplyDeleteOutstanding Write-up👏👏👏
Beautiful write-up, Kofi.
ReplyDelete